{ "lesson": "24-coreference-resolution", "title": "Coreference Resolution", "questions": [ { "stage": "pre", "question": "What is the goal of coreference resolution?", "options": [ "Cluster all mentions (named, nominal, pronominal) that refer to the same real-world entity", "Extract relations", "Tag parts of speech", "Translate pronouns to nouns" ], "correct": 0, "explanation": "Coref clusters mention spans that all refer to the same entity." }, { "stage": "pre", "question": "Which type of expression is a 'nominal' mention?", "options": [ "A verb", "A pronoun like 'she'", "A proper noun only", "A noun phrase such as 'the CEO' or 'the company'" ], "correct": 3, "explanation": "Nominal mentions are noun phrases like 'the company'; pronominal mentions are pronouns." }, { "stage": "check", "question": "What is the modern (Lee et al., 2017) coref architecture?", "options": [ "Rule-based syntactic parsing only", "Decision trees", "End-to-end span-based: enumerate spans, score mentions, then score antecedent probabilities and cluster greedily", "BM25 retrieval" ], "correct": 2, "explanation": "End-to-end neural coref enumerates spans and learns mention + antecedent scoring jointly." }, { "stage": "check", "question": "What does CoNLL F1 average?", "options": [ "MUC, B-cubed, and CEAF-phi4 F1 scores", "Precision and recall", "F1 across languages", "Token and span F1" ], "correct": 0, "explanation": "CoNLL F1 is the mean of MUC, B-cubed, and CEAF-phi4 metrics." }, { "stage": "check", "question": "What is bridging anaphora?", "options": [ "An implicit reference like 'the wheels' implying the wheels of a previously mentioned car", "A mistranslation", "A pronoun before its referent", "A pronoun without an antecedent" ], "correct": 0, "explanation": "Bridging links a mention to a part-of or related entity that was implied but not explicitly stated." }, { "stage": "post", "question": "Why is LLM-only coref unreliable on long documents?", "options": [ "Coref requires a CFG", "LLMs cannot read text", "Tokenizers fail", "Single-call LLMs over-merge or silently drop mentions across 50+ paragraphs; require sliding-window plus merge" ], "correct": 3, "explanation": "Long-doc LLM coref degrades; sliding-window with cross-window merging mitigates." }, { "stage": "post", "question": "Why merge coref clusters into NER results before downstream tasks?", "options": [ "Required by Wikidata", "So downstream tasks see one entity per cluster rather than one per surface mention, dramatically improving coverage", "Lower latency", "To increase token count" ], "correct": 1, "explanation": "Without merging, NER counts each surface form separately and misses 60-80% of entity mentions." }, { "stage": "post", "question": "Why are hard-coded gender rules a fragility in coref systems?", "options": [ "They break on non-binary referents, organizations, and animals; learned scoring is more robust", "They cannot use POS tags", "They require GPU", "They run too fast" ], "correct": 0, "explanation": "Gender heuristics fail in demographically diverse text; learned models are preferred." } ] }